Archive for October, 2009
October 20th, 2009 | 
Author: I am sure that we all have enumerated the qualities that every leader must possess. But, I would like to indicate some characteristics of an Antileader:
Haughty: he believes in possession of the truth, does not listen, does not ask for advices, does not accept other points of view, cannot admit his errors, does not admit its own limitations. All this can lead him to committing very serious errors that put in danger the future of the company, apart from the fact that this way of behaving generates a strong rejection between the personnel.
Unreliable: it promises, but the things never happen, his team strains hoping to obtain the engaged reward and this one does not take place. This leads him to losing any credibility.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in 
This is phrase from Charles S. Lauer, I agree so much with it. And you?
It is inevitable disagreements arise when one is employed at a team. The existence of disagreements / conflicts during the daily work might be desirable. The conflict assures the permanence of the interest and of the sense of responsibility and encourages new kind of solutions.
The conflict is a process that must clear up, not be eliminated. The conflict, it is not to “fight”, neither must it be taken as anything personal, but like an ideas exchange.
Many conflicts sources are born straight of the nature itself of the work. The important thing is to be able to identify these conflict points, to be able to intervene opportunely. The following points are the most common conflicts:
Read the rest of this entry »
The leadership is slightly complex thing, so I wrote this ideas that I had left in the inkwell. For me a leader has to:
To know in what he invests the time: identify “his spendthrifts of time” of his team of work. Are you doing things that he does not need, like to go to unproductive meetings?
To focus in the contribution: he must asking himself: what can I do to affect of significant form the results of this organization?
To develop fortitude: his own and the his subordinates. If you work with the people, benefit from his fortitude instead of concentrating on his weaknesses or flaws.
To establish priorities: do the most important things first. Those who commit themselves with a long list of projects, and advance a little every day, they do not reach turned out in any.
To systematize the decision making:
a) define the problem in precise and finished way.
b) specify what the decision must achieve.
c) turn the decision into action (report what debit to do to him who it should do it).
d) prove the effectiveness of the decision obtaining feedback.
Tags: What is a Leader? Is the person with aptitude to generate changes on other persons and this way to guide his behavior.A good leader, may be do this kind of things:
- He knows that his worst enemy is the pride and the self-sufficiency.
- It understands that to live extinguishing fires does not allow to generate the conditions to avoid them.
- He avoids to create rules that could not be applied.
- He constructs an ambience of work where the people want to be.
- It understands that the fear, it is not a tool to persuade the people.
- He insures himself of making people more productive.